While I was multi-tabling 4 NLHE SnG's yesterday at Full Tilt and interesting hand played out. Here is some of the background:
I am just under the starting stack of 1500 at this table because I have been folding nearly all my hands. Anyone who is observant would see this and peg me as a tight player. I haven't shown anything to define whether I am passive or aggressive. In the cut-off I am dealt AQ and bring it in for a standard 3X raise. The small blind raise back pot. I think about it for a second and realize that there are two other big stacks at this table and if I have any chance to compete in this SnG this is going to be as good a time as any. I push and my opponent calls. Before you read on, think about what my opponent has and venture a guess.
HIGHLIGHT THIS AREA --->Pocket 3's! <--- TO SEE THE RESULT. Identifying a bad play is almost as valuable as performing a good one so I'm spending a lot more time analyzing some of the more interesting hands that I come up against. There are some key points that I want to outline that I feel are important:
By the tone of the post many would think that I lost the hand. They would be wrong. I won the hand with a straight but that really doesn't matter. I feel that I still made the right play and even if the pot got pushed to my opponent I would still feel good about pushing all-in.
I am just under the starting stack of 1500 at this table because I have been folding nearly all my hands. Anyone who is observant would see this and peg me as a tight player. I haven't shown anything to define whether I am passive or aggressive. In the cut-off I am dealt AQ and bring it in for a standard 3X raise. The small blind raise back pot. I think about it for a second and realize that there are two other big stacks at this table and if I have any chance to compete in this SnG this is going to be as good a time as any. I push and my opponent calls. Before you read on, think about what my opponent has and venture a guess.
HIGHLIGHT THIS AREA --->Pocket 3's! <--- TO SEE THE RESULT. Identifying a bad play is almost as valuable as performing a good one so I'm spending a lot more time analyzing some of the more interesting hands that I come up against. There are some key points that I want to outline that I feel are important:
- I was the one who pushed all-in. It's one thing to push all-in but it's another to call an all-in, especially pre-flop. Since I push all-in I can add some fold equity to my hand giving me the edge versus a small pair.
- With my hand I'm only worried about 4 other hands. Aces, Kings, Queens and Ace-King. With every other hand out there I am either a coin flip or I'm dominating them.
- My image, even though it doesn't really matter at these limits, is that of a very tight player, and with the push all-in I can now be classified as Tight-Aggressive.
- My opponent is at best, 50/50, but it's just as likely that they are dominated. Even though I was only afraid of four hands there is only one hand I can hold (deuces) where my opponent can be confident.
By the tone of the post many would think that I lost the hand. They would be wrong. I won the hand with a straight but that really doesn't matter. I feel that I still made the right play and even if the pot got pushed to my opponent I would still feel good about pushing all-in.